Drawing for SUPERSPOOL SYSTEM

USPTO serial 76063188

SUPERSPOOL SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SUPERSPOOL SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHANIE K. WADE

STEPHANIE K WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-1526UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Spool of slit tape material made of fabric, namely, airlaid tapes, composite tapes, laminate tapes, spunbond tapes, spunlace tapes, hydro-entangled tapes, glass matt tapes, stitchbonded tapes, embossed tapes, perforated fabric tapes, woven fabric tapes, meltblown tapes, wet laid tapes, foam bonded tapes, needlepunched tapes, felted tapes, carded tapes, garnetted tapes, wadded tapes, calendered tapes, and foamed tapes, but specifically excluding audio tapes, for use in the manufacture of product packaging, personal care products, and for use in the wire and cable industry; returnable unwind stands to stabilize and protect the spools of slit tape material while in transit, storage and useACTIVE—
035winding of a spool of slit tape material into pre-wound packages for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 13, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance