USPTO serial 76063227
SAT - SELF ADJUSTING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAT - SELF ADJUSTING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New Brunswick, NJ
New Brunswick, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | MATTRESSES AND SEATING, NAMELY LOUNGE CHAIRS, RECLINERS, MASSAGE CHAIRS AND OFFICE CHAIRS WITH SELF ADJUSTING TECHNOLOGY THAT DYNAMICALLY RESPONDS TO A PERSON'S BODY WEIGHT TO PROVIDE THE LOWEST POSSIBLE INTERFACE PRESSURES REGARDLESS OF BODY WEIGHT, SHAPE OR SIZE | ABANDONED | Oct 17, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |