Drawing for VISIONOMICS CULTURAL CONSCIENCE

USPTO serial 76063333

VISIONOMICS CULTURAL CONSCIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISIONOMICS CULTURAL CONSCIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TAWNI L. WILHELM

TAWNI L WILHELM SHOOK HARDY & BACON LLPONE KANSAS CITY PL1200 MAIN STKANSAS CITY, MO 64105-2118

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, FOR WORD PROCESSING, FOR USE AS A SPREAD SHEET, AND FOR PROVIDING VISUAL GRAPHICS TO ENABLE LEADERS IN AN ORGANIZATION TO PRIORITIZE INITIATIVES NEEDING TO BE INCORPORATED INTO A BUSINESS PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVING AND RENEWING THE CULTURE AND PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL ENVIRONMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance