USPTO serial 76063756
FLAT IRON BUILDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAT IRON BUILDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Andelson
MICHAEL ANDELSON BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP74-760 HWY 111STE 200INDIAN WELLS, CA 92210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | LEASING OF REAL PROPERTY, NAMELY STUDIOS, GALLERY SPACE AND PERFORMANCE STUDIO THEATERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |