USPTO serial 76063801
BIOTAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOTAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dr Paul Schmidt and Dr Kobus Preller Partnership, The
Clapham, London, SW4 0QP, GB
Other trademarks owned by Dr Paul Schmidt and Dr Kobus Preller Partnership, The
Dr Paul Schmidt and Dr Kobus Preller Partnership, The
Clapham, London, SW4 0QP, GB
Other trademarks owned by Dr Paul Schmidt and Dr Kobus Preller Partnership, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas L. Lockhart
THOMAS L LOCKHART VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLPBRIDGEWATER PLP O BOX 352GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN KEEPING PATIENT RECORDS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER HARDWARE And MONITORS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF PATIENT RECORDS; ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING TAGS FOR USE IN KEEPING PATIENT RECORDS; ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING TAGS FOR USE ON SAMPLES OBTAINED FROM PATIENTS; NON-SILICONE COMPUTER HARDWARE; ELECTRONIC AND MECHANICAL SMART CARDS FOR TAGGING AND MONITORING; COMPUTERS, PORTABLE AS WELL AS STATIONARY FOR READING TAGS AND MARKINGS; ELECTRONIC AND/OR MECHANICAL SMART CARDS FOR IDENTIFICATION; ELECTRONIC TAGGING SYSTEMS COMPRISING OF A MICROCHIP WORN BY PATIENTS TO CONFIRM THEIR WHEREABOUTS; ANALOGUE AND DIGITAL DATA CARRIERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS TO ENABLE CONNECTIONS TO DATABASES AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; ELECTRONIC DATA STORAGE MEDIA NAMELY CARDS, DISCS, TAPES, MICROCHIPS, ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS, TAGS; MAGNETIC DATA MEDIA, MAGNETIC ANALOGUE AND DIGITAL DATA CARRIERS ALL SOLD BLANK; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND MONITORS, ALL FOR USE WITH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE; COMPUTERS FOR ENCODING AND DECODING; ELECTRONIC AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PERIPHERAL HARDWARE, ALL FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS AND/OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE; COMPUTERS FOR PERFORMING ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION; COMPUTERS FOR IDENTIFYING, MONITORING, CHECKING OR LOGGING INFORMATION; COMPUTERS FOR USE IN SURVEILLANCE AND FOR USE AS WARNING DEVICES; ON-LINE DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY GUIDES AND PAMPHLETS IN THE FIELD OF PATIENT RECORDS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE TO ENABLE CONNECTION TO DATABASES AND THE INTERNET; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE TO ENABLE SEARCHING OF DATA; COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR USE BY INTERNET SERVICES PROVIDERS; INTERNET, WIRELESS AND SMART CARD TECHNOLOGY HARDWARE FOR USE IN COMMUNICATING PATIENT'S RECORDS TO CLINICIANS HELD ON MICROCHIP AND FOR USE IN STORING INVENTORIES OF HOSPITAL CONSUMABLES, NAMELY TEST TUBES; SYSTEMS WHICH CONSIST OF COMBINATION OF SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE COMPONENTS DESIGNED TO EXCHANGE DATA WIRELESSLY AND WITHOUT HUMAN ADMINISTRATION; PORTABLE COMPUTER HARDWARE AND MONITORS; TEST TUBES AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH APPARATUS, NAMELY MICROSCOPES, ANALYSERS, MICROTITRE PLATES, SENSORS, AND LABORATORY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, INCUBATORS, FOR USE IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF PATIENT'S MEDICAL DETAILS VIA COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO THE INTERNET OR DATABASES; TELECOMMUNICATION GATEWAY SERVICES; TRANSMISSION OF DATA ACCESSIBLE BY ACCESS CODE TO A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; DELIVERY OF INFORMATION, NAMELY TEST RESULTS, SAMPLE PROCESSING STATUS, BED MANAGEMENT, LOCATION OF PATIENTS, STOCK CONTROL OF LABORATORY CONSUMABLES THROUGH THE INTERNET AND OTHER TELEPHONIC AND TELEGRAPHIC MEANS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER TIME-SHARING SERVICES; SECURITY SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, ACCESS TO DATABASES, CHECKING OF USER PASSWORDS AND THE COMPUTER AIDED IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION; COMPUTER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; ELECTRONIC TAGGING OF PATIENTS TEST TUBES FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES; RENTAL AND LEASING OF COMPUTERS; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE; TECHNICAL CONSULTING AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE, SURGERY AND PHARMACEUTICALS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGNED FOR OTHERS; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF SECURITY; HOSTING THE WEB SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND HOSTING OF WEB SITES; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURING SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT FOR USE IN RELATION TO PATIENTS MEDICAL RECORDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr Paul Schmidt and Dr Kobus Preller Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Dr Paul Schmidt and Dr Kobus Preller Partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIOTAG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 31, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |