USPTO serial 76064099
GLOBALTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBALTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M. DOWNEY
ROBERT M DOWNEY ROBERT M DOWNEY PA601 S FEDERAL HWY STE 300BOCA RATON, FL 33432-6008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | local, long distance, and international wireless telephone communication services; and providing voice mail telecommunication services via the internet | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |