Drawing for WHERE VIRTUALLY EVERYONE PLAYS POKER

USPTO serial 76064179

WHERE VIRTUALLY EVERYONE PLAYS POKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHERE VIRTUALLY EVERYONE PLAYS POKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER L. JOLLEY

JENNIFER L JOLLEY STRATTON BALLEW PLLC1313 SEATTLE TWR1218 3RD AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-3097

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Betting and wagering services provided via a global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 10, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 17, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance