USPTO serial 76064304
LINEARCODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2782303Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2003
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LINEARCODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
71908 Maccabim, IL
71908 Maccabim, IL
71700 MODIIN, IL
71700 MODIIN, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sol Sheinbein
WARREN A SKLAR RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR19TH FL 1621 EUCLID AVECLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PRESENTING, EDITING, TRANSLATING, ANALYZING AND COMPARING OLIGOSACCHARIDES AND THE POST TRANSLATION MODIFICATION OF PROTEINS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLYCOMINDS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by GLYCOMINDS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CARBOZYME NT LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CARBOZYME NT LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LINEARCODE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |