USPTO serial 76064479
HUGGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUGGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Soft plush and/or cloth toys including fantasy characters and animals, soft doll toys with vinyl or cloth heads, and inscale accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |