USPTO serial 76064740
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W. COOK
THOMAS W COOKP O BOX 19893030 BRIDGEWAY STE 425SAUSALITO, CA 94965| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIVITY SOFTWARE USED TO ESTABLISH AND MANAGE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A COMPUTER AND COMPUTER NETWORKS IN THE FIELD OF INTERNET SECURITY; TCP/IP SOFTWARE USED IN INTEGRATING COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE USED FOR TERMINAL EMULATION LINKING PERSONAL COMPUTERS TO A UNIX ENVIRONMENT | ACTIVE | Jul 20, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |