USPTO serial 76065037
OGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SADDLE BROOK, NJ
SADDLE BROOK, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arnold D. Litt
ARNOLD D LITT CEVASCO BOTTINNELLI & LITT, ET AL.25 MAIN ST #6HACKENSACK, NJ 07601-7015UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Tooth gel, tooth paste and tooth polish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |