Drawing for KANVAS

USPTO serial 76065102

KANVAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KANVAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

DUANE M BYERS NIXON & VANDERHYE, PC1100 N GLEBE RD STE 800ARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Letter and document file racks, and file racks, but not including any such goods covered with or incorporating canvasACTIVE—
020Tables, namely, furniture tables, industrial tables; desks; display stands for displaying products, printed notices and artwork; office furniture; furniture screens; room dividers; partitioning systems, namely, furniture partitions, room partitions, free-standing office partitions; shelves, cupboards, racks, namely, display racks and storage racks; desking and work surfaces in the nature of furniture for office, commercial and industrial premises, but not including any such goods covered with or incorporating canvasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
May 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance