USPTO serial 76065260
MOGUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOGUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Berkowitz
LESLIE BERKOWITZ THE BERKOWITZ FIRM PCTHE 1700 GRANT BLDG303 E 17TH AVE STE 780DENVER, CO 80203-1260Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE USED IN MANAGING PORTFOLIOS OF CORPORATE PROPRIETARY PROJECTS AND RIGHTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |