USPTO serial 76065296
NONNA'S KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2603587Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2002
- Examiner
- GORMAN, MAUREEN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NONNA'S KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA
Hayward, CA
Hayward, CA
Hayward, CA
HAYWARD, CA
HAYWARD, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat or vegetables, namely meatballs, chili relleno, meatloaf, chicken parmesan, chicken piccata, chicken sesame and ginger, chow mein; vegetable and meat based salads, namely, black bean salad, Mexican corn salad, calamari salad, cole slaw salad, potato salad, red potato and herb salad; potato pancakes; garlic mushrooms; processed Sicilian olives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1989 |
| 030 | Lasagna; tamales; focaccia bread, pesto pasta salad; macaroni salad; Italian pasta and prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice, namely pork fried rice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TONY'S FINE FOODS.
- Other trademarks owned by Nonna's Kitchen, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nonna's Kitchen, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nonna's Kitchen, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COLUMBUS DISTRIBUTING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COLUMBUS MANUFACTURING INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NONNA'S KITCHEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |