USPTO serial 76065594
EVERY IMAGE IS A STORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERY IMAGE IS A STORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beit Shemesh, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306-2105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Digital images; computer hardware and software for encoding and protecting digital images; computer hardware and software for image distribution systems; computer hardware and software for linking digital images to electronic commerce, and manuals supplied therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services for encoding and protecting digital images; computer services for image distribution systems; computer services for linking digital images to electronic commerce | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |