USPTO serial 76065802
VAPOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VAPOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Melbourne Victoria, AU
Melbourne Victoria, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, BANDANAS, BASEBALL CAPS, BATHING TRUNKS, BIKINIS, CLOTHING CAPS, GYM SHORTS, GYM SUITS, JACKETS, JUMPERS, SWEAT PANTS, SPORT SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TRACKSUITS, CLOTHING TOPS, WIND RESISTANT JACKETS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |