USPTO serial 76066261
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEHIND CLOSED DOORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL M CISLO
DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Theatrical production services for plays, television, music, and movies | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |