USPTO serial 76066273
IP IQ = MOBILITY FOR EVERYDAY LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IP IQ = MOBILITY FOR EVERYDAY LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELISSA A VALLONE
MELISSA A VALLONE BARNES & THORNBURG2600 CHASE PLZ10 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PROVISION OF CUSTOMER SERVICE AND BILLING TO USERS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; INSTALLATION AND CUSTOMIZATION OF SOFTWARE IN THE AREA OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK PROTOCOL FOR CUSTOMER CARE AND BILLING, MANAGEMENT OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND BILLING ACCOUNTS FOR BUSINESS AND INDIVIDUALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |