USPTO serial 76066428
HALLEWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HALLEWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Grace
DAVID W GRACE TRADEMARK DEPTLOEB & LOEB LLP10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY SKIN CLARIFIERS, SKIN CREAMS, SKIN GELS, SKIN LOTIONS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SKIN OILS, SKIN POWDERS, SKIN SOAPS, SKIN TONERS, SUN SCREEN PREPARATIONS, LIPSTICK, MAKEUP, AND NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, PERFUME, AND HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY LINGERIE, UNDERGARMENTS, SLEEPWEAR, ROBES, LOUNGEWARE, FOUNDATION GARMENTS, BODY SUITS, TOPS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, PANTS, SHORTS, JEANS, PANTSUITS, JACKETS, SWEATERS, SWIM WEAR, GLOVES, SOCKS, GYM SUITS, JOGGING SUITS, AND SCARVES; HEAD WEAR AND HATS; AND SANDALS, SHOES, AND SLIPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ON-LINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING CLOTHING, COSMETICS, PHOTOGRAPHS, POSTERS, AND ENTERTAINMENT THEMED NOVELTY ITEMS, SUCH AS MUGS, KEY-CHAINS, AND STICKERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bumper Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Bumper Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HALLEWOOD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |