USPTO serial 76066548
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARLA B OAKLEY, ESQ
CARLA B OAKLEY ESQ BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Equipment and supplies for wine making namely barrels casks bottles corks, stakes wire root stock-- grapes -- alcoholic beverages from grapes namely wine port wine coolers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Information clearing house for the wine industry; providing an online database of information related to the wine industry; providing an online marketplace for businesses to buy sell and/or trade wine industry related goods and services, namely grapes wines equipment supplies bottling transportation marketing and design | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing an electronic forum for sharing information learning about industry news and events and researching areas of interest in the wine industry | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |