Drawing for BMA

USPTO serial 76066744

BMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheldon R. Meyer

SHELDON R MEYER FLIESLER, DUBB, MEYER & LOVEJOY LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of research services, namely preparation of statistics for scientific researchACTIVE—
036Provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of membership benefits, namely discounts for car rentals, roadside assistance, and medical equipmentACTIVE—
041Provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of medical educational and informational services, namely provision of correspondence courses; arranging and conducting of educational conferences and seminars; arranging and conducting of educational exhibitions relating to medical matters; provision of medical instruction courses, educational examination services, medical tuition services; publication of printed matter, namely medical texts, books, magazines, journals, news, and magazinesACTIVE—
042Provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of professional membership services and benefits, namely legal services; provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of location services, namely providing facilities for conferences, seminars and exhibitions relating to medical matters; provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of consultant services, namely medical matters; medical services; medical research and development services for others; provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of mediation services; provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of poll services, namely conducting of public opinion polls; provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of counseling services, namely career counseling; provision of services via an on-line global computer network to medical professionals and students in the field of reporting services, namely compilation and provision of medical reports; professional membership services and benefits, namely professional organization and trade union representation, medical professional and legal servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 20, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance