Drawing for NEUROVISION

USPTO serial 76067173

NEUROVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David T. Burse

DAVID T BURSE BIGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLPTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1800SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, computer hardware, computer peripherals and accessories, including, computer audio systems and headphones, automated glasses, input devices, sensors for measuring distance between subject and monitor, sensors for measuring room ambient light, sensors for measuring computer monitor luminescence, hardware and eyewear to enable three dimensional image generation and perception, and moldings, all for use in delivering visual perception tasks, as well as other perception stimuli, for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies, for improving visual perception and acuity, and for developing improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system, all for use by vision care professionals, therapists, and individualsACTIVE—
041Providing training on computer software to vision care professionals, therapists, and individuals; providing interactive training in the form of perception stimuli to develop improved neural performance in the brain and nervous system of individualsACTIVE—
042Administering visual perception tasks, as well as other perception stimuli, for identifying and alleviating visual perception and acuity deficiencies, and for improving visual perception and acuity in individuals; technical support services, namely trouble shooting of computer software problems in person, via telephone, and via e-mailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance