USPTO serial 76067309
IDPARTNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2003
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IDPARTNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
Concord, MA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
Concord, MA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
Concord, MA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Gaff
HEATHER E BALMAT CHOATE, HALL & STEWART LLPTWO INTERNATIONAL PLATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Fully integrated, company-wide product management software which integrates and automates product development processes with respect to new products, allocates resources in connection with products, manages product lines simultaneously across multiple product development projects, and manages product portfolios | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 16, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Development Enterprise, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IDPARTNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |