USPTO serial 76067501
CM IN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2840592Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2004
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CM IN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID KAMKHAGI
6222 RICHMOND, STE 840HOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, made from fourteen karat gold and eighteen karat gold, sterling silver and eighteen karat gold, silver and vermeil, silver and enamel, and platinum, namely, chains, rings, earrings, necklaces, bracelets, charms, and bangle bracelets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |