Drawing for NEXWOOD

USPTO serial 76067647

NEXWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2967376Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 12, 2005
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEXWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce A. Tassan

Bruce A Tassan Tassan & Hardison4143 27th Street NorthArlington, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Composite building material, namely fibreboard composed of fibrous materials and plastic intended for use in constructing fences, decks, docks and outdoor structuresSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDAug 21, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2009C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 26, 2009CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 24, 2009CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Dec 18, 2008PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 12, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 26, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 20, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 10, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 31, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance