USPTO serial 76068035
MEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Toren
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | scientific, surveying, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, control and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, front tension indicators, band flatness indicators, thermometers, tachometers,pressure gauges, goniometers, roughness indicators, control devices such as flatness control devices, roughness control devices, pressure control devices, tension control devices; control stands for rolling mills, electrical and magnetic sensors, frequency meters, signal transmitters; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely video cameras, displays; blank magnetic data carriers; calculating machines; data processing equipment, namely computers; stored computer programs; computer programs for controlling rolling mills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |