USPTO serial 76068464
SUNSWEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNSWEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Ullman
JAMES A ULLMAN GREENBERG TRAURIG2375 E CAMELBACK RD STE 700PHOENIX, AZ 85016-9000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Unprocessed tomatoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2004 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |