USPTO serial 76068739
MOBILIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pointe Claire, Quebec, CA
Pointe Claire, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean Ploen
SEAN PLOEN TESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT, LLPHIGH ST TWR125 HIGH STBOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE, NAMELY, LIVING ROOM, DINING ROOM, LAWN AND BEDROOM FURNITURE; KITCHEN FURNITURE, NAMELY, KITCHEN TABLES AND CHAIRS, COUNTERTOPS; PILLOWS; CUSHIONS; WALL DECORATIONS, NAMELY, PICTURE FRAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | WINDOW CURTAINS; BEDCOVERS, NAMELY, BEDSPREADS, BLANKETS, SHEETS, PILLOWCASES, PILLOW SHAMS, DUST RUFFLES, BED CANOPIES, DUVET COVERS, DUVETS, AND BED LINES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES, NAMELY, RETAIL HOME FURNITURE STORES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mobilia Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Mobilia Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MOBILIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |