USPTO serial 76069691
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
George Town, Grand Cayman, KY
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services; credit services; financial transaction authorization and settlement services; provision of loans; stocks and bond brokerage; capital investments; financial consultancy; financial evaluation, factoring, financial information, financial management services; electronics funds transfer; instalment of loans; issue of tokens of value; stock exchange quotations; banking services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Communications by computer terminals, communications by telephone, computer aided transmission of messages and images, electronic mail, message sending services; advisory and consultancy services on the aforesaid; advisory and consultancy services relating to electronic transmission and data capture systems used in connection with brokerage and financial services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software development; computer data base services; leasing access time to a computer data base; leasing access time to a computer for the manipulation of data; computer systems analysis; services for recovery of computer data bases; professional consultancy and advisory services relating to computer and data processing apparatus; computer network services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |