Drawing for SP CHECKPOINT

USPTO serial 76069770

SP CHECKPOINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SP CHECKPOINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas B Luebbering

THOMAS B LUEBBERING HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP2405 GRAND BLVD STE 400KANSAS CITY, MO 64108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009AUTOMATED CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRESCRIPTION VERIFICATION COMPRISING A COMPUTER MONITOR AND STAND THEREFOR, CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT, BAR CODE SCANNER, KEYBOARD, AND COMPUTER MOUSEABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 4, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 4, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 4, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 16, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance