USPTO serial 76070405
THE THINKING BEHIND THE GAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE THINKING BEHIND THE GAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, financial management services, financial planning services, estate planning services, financial consultation and planning services specifically in the areas of tax planning, retirement planning, gift planning and distribution planning, financial management of endowments and private foundations, administration of employee benefit plans, financial portfolio management services, investment advice, management and consultation services, investment banking services, securities underwriting and brokerage services, annuities and life insurance underwriting services, stock, mortgage, and mutual fund brokerage services, banking services, insurance underwriting services in the fields of automobiles, homeowners, life, disability, and credit cards, insurance administration, and insurance consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE THINKING BEHIND THE GAME
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |