USPTO serial 76070662
NIAGARA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NIAGARA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STACEY R. HALPERN
Timothy Keyes15052 Springdale St suite kHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHEESE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |