USPTO serial 76071311
ANISTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANISTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Owens
ROCHELLE D ALPERT MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLPONE MARKET, SPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, STEROIDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX5M | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX5D | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |