Drawing for EARN-E

USPTO serial 76072119

EARN-E

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARN-E?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009OPTICAL, ELECTROTECHNICAL AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND DEVICES RELATING TO ELECTRONIC BUSINESS, NAMELY, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE FOR PERFORMING ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE
036ELECTRONIC PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENTS AND BILL PAYMENT DATAACTIVE
038OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATION FOR OTHERS OF COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, DEVICES AND SYSTEMS USED IN PERFORMING ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ELECTRONIC COMMERCE VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; RENTING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMSACTIVE
042CONSULTANCY RELATING TO THE SETTING UP AND OPERATION OF TELECOMMUNICATION, COMPUTER AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING ELECTRONIC BUSINESS SERVICES; WEBSITE DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR OTHERS; WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; SYSTEM INTEGRATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DATA, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, NAMELY, INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF DATA, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY INCLUSIVE OF DATA AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR ELECTRONIC BUSINESS AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, NAMELY, DESIGNING COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC BUSINESS AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR ELECTRONIC BUSINESS, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARD WARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS AND MONITORING THE OPERATION OF NETWORK SYSTEMS FOR OTHERSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 200144EASEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance