Drawing for LISA

USPTO serial 76072339

LISA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LISA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura E. Goldbard

LAURA E GOLDBARD STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP180 MAIDEN LNNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, computer software for use in relation to financial management, including investment management, unit trust administration, pensions, fund administration, commission management, insurance, compliance asset management and propertyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 3, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 3, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 30, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 18, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 16, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance