USPTO serial 76073772
TELOPTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELOPTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTOELECTRONICS DEVICES, SUBSYSTEMS AND SYSTEMS USING ELECTRONIC SIGNALS, ANALOG SIGNALS AND DIGITAL SIGNALS TO CONTROL AND MANIPULATE LIGHT FOR INFORMATION HANDLING AND COMMUNICATION PURPOSES, NAMELY, OPTICAL ATTENUATORS, OPTICAL BEAM SPLITTERS, OPTICAL POLARIZATION ROTATORS, OPTICAL BEAM COMBINERS, MODULATORS, OPTICAL MODULATORS, FIBER OPTIC MODULATORS, TRANSMITTERS, FIBER OPTIC TRANSMITTERS, OPTICAL WA E GUIDES, FIBER OPTIC CABLES, FILTERS, OPTICAL FILTERS, FIBER OPTIC TUNABLE FILTERS, TOTAL INTERNAL REFLECTION SWITCHES, OPTICAL SWITCHES, FIBER OPTIC SWITCHES, SWITCHING FABRICS, CROSSBAR SWITCHES, OPTICAL CROSSBAR SWITCHES, PLANAR LIGHTWAVE CIRCUITS, OPTOELECTRONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, MULTIPLEXERS, ADD-DROP MULTIPLEXERS, OPTICAL GAIN MODULES, OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS, FIBER OPTIC AMPLIFIERS, PARAMETRIC OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS, SPATIAL LIGHT MODULATORS, OPTICAL SENSORS AND MICROWAVE SENSORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |