USPTO serial 76074154
RELICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RELICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlestown, MA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Retail store services in the field of antique and vintage goods, namely, furniture, architectural salvage and miscellaneous household items | ACTIVE | Feb 20, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |