USPTO serial 76075151
OROCYP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OROCYP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of tobacco Dependence and the reduction of associated illnesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |