USPTO serial 76075351
REACHFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REACHFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for business in the area of workflow, operations, product integration and automation of forms-based processes; computer software for the development and integration of computerized forms; computer software for the creation of business applications and automation of forms-based processes through global computer communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |