USPTO serial 76075895
CROSSFIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROSSFIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Coughlin
WILLIAM J COUGHLIN DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION800 CHRYSLER DR E CIMS 483-02-19AUBURN HILLS, MI 48326-2757UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motor vehicles, namely automobiles and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 14, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |