USPTO serial 76077819
HYPERCHIP PETABIT ROUTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYPERCHIP PETABIT ROUTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Networking, telecommunications, connectivity, routing, fiber optic transport and network access equipment, namely, traffic managers, servers, routers, hubs, switches, optical amplifiers and switches, wireless switches, base stations, gateways, bridges, brouters, concentrators, aggregators, modems, network interface cards, line cards, switch routers, electronic equipment racks, shelves for electronic equipment racks, hardware modules, backplanes, mid-planes and automatic call distributors; and computer programs relating to the foregoing, namely, computer programs for networking computers, for network traffic engineering, and for accessing, controlling, monitoring and managing global computer networks, local area networks, wide area networks, metropolitan area networks and storage area networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |