USPTO serial 76079308
INTEGRITY, CREATIVITY, INDUSTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2004
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRITY, CREATIVITY, INDUSTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
Springfield, VA
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
Springfield, VA
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
Springfield, VA
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn Law
GLENN LAW FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 500 3000 K ST N WP O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Electronic scanning and conversion services of photographic images, electronic images, audio material, electronic automated online forms for incorporation of full color photos, and for use in 3D models, full motion videos, posters, video, brochure and flyer production; conversion of printed material from one media to another for use in document archival, retrieval and preservation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 1999 |
| 042 | Customization of computer programs for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Technology Application, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTEGRITY, CREATIVITY, INDUSTRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |