USPTO serial 76079331
A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS, DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRICAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRONICS, CUSTOM MANUFACTURING OF ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS, DESIGN AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, AN ELECTRONIC BULLETIN BOARD IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS RENDERED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, AND OTHER SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |