USPTO serial 76079334
AMPTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMPTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS, ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES, UNINTERRUPTED POWER SUPPLIES, ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS AND OTHER ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS AND DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |