USPTO serial 76080993
VB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARRISON, LAKEISHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Milford, Ontario K0K, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTIAN D FIELDING
CHRISTIAN D FIELDING TEMPLEMAN MENNINGA205 DUNDAS ST E STE 200BELLEVILLE, ON K8N 5A2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | entertainment services, namely, operating live performance theaters; production services, namely, directing live performances and motion pictures; film, video, and videotape editing; live musical and video performance, and live musical and visual recording for others; video and motion picture production and distribution; operating performing arts schools and clown schools, and conducting educational classes, seminars and workshops relating to entertainment performances, and distributing informational, instructional and motivational course materials in connection therewith; conducting self-help classes, seminars and workshops relating to social problems and issues, and distributing informational, instructional, and motivational course materials, in connection therewith; providing information on a computer website about theatrical performances and educational classes relating to social problems and issues, clown schools and performing arts schools, and distributing informational, instructional and motivational course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |