USPTO serial 76081165
PLASTICCASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2993558Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2005
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PLASTICCASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry A. Schulman, Esq.
JERRY A SCHULMAN ESQ LAW OFFICE OF JERRY A SCHULMANTER EXECUTIVE CTR COURT C1 S 376 SUMMIT AVEOAKBROOK TERRACE, IL 60181Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services; namely, providing local and networked credit card services and debit card services in the nature of automatic teller machines and point-of-sale cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |