USPTO serial 76083354
IMMUNE FORMULATION 100
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMMUNE FORMULATION 100?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A. JACKSON
DAVID A JACKSON KLAUBER & JACKSON411 HACKENSACK AVEHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROIMMUNE COMPANY, L.L.C., THE
- Other trademarks owned by PROIMMUNE COMPANY, L.L.C., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named IMMUNE FORMULATION 100
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |