USPTO serial 76083468
WIREHEAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3080007Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 11, 2006
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WIREHEAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WireHead, part of TeVCA Technologies, Inc.
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by WireHead, part of TeVCA Technologies, Inc.
AUSTIN, TX
AUSTIN, TX
AUSTIN, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOME ENTERTAINMENT SYSTEMS COMPRISING HIGH DEFINITION TELEVISIONS, TELEVISIONS, CABLE TUNERS, SATELLITE RECEIVERS, AND DVD AUDIO/VIDEO PLAYERS; STEREO SYSTEMS COMPRISING CASSETTE PLAYERS, RADIOS, SPEAKERS AND AUDIO COMPACT DISC PLAYERS; TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT COMPRISING TELEPHONES, HEADSETS AND TELEPHONES KEY SETS; COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND NETWORK ROUTERS; SEMICONDUCTORS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND POWER TRANSISTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WireHead, part of TeVCA Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VOGLER, DAN LEE
- Other trademarks owned by VOGLER, DAN LEE
- Other trademarks owned by VOGLER, DAN LEE
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WIREHEAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |