Drawing for AMPTEK

USPTO serial 76083490

AMPTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMPTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS USED IN THE HOME AND OFFICE; AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRICAL LIGHTING AND ELECTRONICS USED IN THE HOME AND OFFICE; DESIGN AND TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance