Drawing for AMPTEK

USPTO serial 76083491

AMPTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMPTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS, ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES AND UNINTERRUPTED ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES FOR ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; AND POWER MANAGEMENT COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO MONITOR THE STATUS AND CONTROL THE PERFORMANCE OF INTERRUPTED ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance